PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRMCX vs. BSCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRMCX achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 20.16% return.


FRMCX

1D
0.70%
1M
1.50%
YTD
13.51%
6M
11.26%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
12.19%

BSCMX

1D
1.52%
1M
4.65%
YTD
20.16%
6M
17.78%
1Y
44.58%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
13.51%7.25%8.47%11.72%0.62%29.86%3.70%44.38%-18.32%
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
20.16%23.51%24.77%22.75%-7.89%27.61%20.38%12.82%-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FRMCX and BSCMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FRMCX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRMCX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRMCX
FRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCMX
BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRMCXBSCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.62

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

15.85

-9.87

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the BSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRMCX and BSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRMCX and BSCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRMCXBSCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.77%

-38.12%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-9.65%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.84%

-22.34%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-22.34%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

0.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-6.00%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.81%

+1.29%

Volatility

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 4.33%. This indicates that FRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRMCXBSCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

4.33%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

11.93%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

17.47%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.14%

17.94%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

20.57%

+4.42%

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRMCX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRMCX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison

FRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.43%, more than BSCMX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
3.78%4.54%2.31%3.50%2.93%4.38%1.76%1.11%9.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
13.43%15.24%25.34%5.16%6.09%17.71%5.63%36.24%6.75%7.74%8.86%13.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRMCX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRMCX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to BSCMX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRMCX dropped -56.77% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.

BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRMCX and BSCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer