PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FRIN.L vs. UB20.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FRIN.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FRIN.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD while UB20.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRIN.L returned 5.47%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for UB20.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIN.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UB20.L.

Performance

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while UB20.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB20.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -10.53% return, which is significantly lower than UB20.L's 8.88% return.

FRIN.L

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-10.53%
6M
-10.61%
1Y
-9.00%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
—

UB20.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.41%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.55%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF		-10.53%-4.08%12.58%14.76%3.17%26.55%9.19%-4.64%
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		8.88%12.00%6.98%-0.60%5.80%5.29%2.35%-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIN.L and UB20.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.29

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FRIN.L
UB20.L

Financial Services

27.1%
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
6.0%

Industrials

10.3%
8.5%

Energy

9.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

9.2%
14.6%

Technology

8.4%
1.1%

Healthcare

6.5%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
3.0%

Utilities

5.3%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
7.8%

Financial Services

FRIN.L
27.1%
UB20.L
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FRIN.L
12.0%
UB20.L
6.0%

Industrials

FRIN.L
10.3%
UB20.L
8.5%

Energy

FRIN.L
9.5%
UB20.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

FRIN.L
9.2%
UB20.L
14.6%

Technology

FRIN.L
8.4%
UB20.L
1.1%

Healthcare

FRIN.L
6.5%
UB20.L
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

FRIN.L
5.8%
UB20.L
3.0%

Utilities

FRIN.L
5.3%
UB20.L
3.6%

Communication Services

FRIN.L
4.6%
UB20.L
2.7%

Real Estate

FRIN.L
1.3%
UB20.L
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with FRIN.L:
FRIN.L vs. IIND.LFRIN.L vs. FLINFRIN.L vs. XNIF.LFRIN.L vs. XCX5.LFRIN.L vs. AIE.LFRIN.L vs. VNMFRIN.L vs. IGC
Often compared with UB20.L:
UB20.L vs. EQQQ.LUB20.L vs. XKS2.LUB20.L vs. UC44.LUB20.L vs. ASDV.LUB20.L vs. HMEF.LUB20.L vs. IAPD.LUB20.L vs. PADV.L

Return for Risk

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FRIN.L
FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
UB20.L
UB20.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
UB20.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB20.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB20.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
UB20.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB20.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FRIN.LUB20.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.64
1.62

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.84
2.42

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.29

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

2.46

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

7.51

-8.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the UB20.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIN.L and UB20.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FRIN.LUB20.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

1.62

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.47

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.68

-0.36

Drawdowns

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and UB20.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FRIN.LUB20.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-30.04%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.95%

-7.32%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.37%

-17.80%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-17.80%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.04%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-3.03%

-15.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-5.59%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.91%

2.37%

+5.54%

Volatility

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that FRIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FRIN.LUB20.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

3.70%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

8.48%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

11.12%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

15.34%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

18.15%

+1.26%

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIN.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison

FRIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		2.93%3.86%3.26%3.97%3.64%2.60%3.05%4.03%4.36%3.43%4.00%5.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

FRIN.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRIN.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRIN.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UB20.L.

FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIN.L and UB20.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer