FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FRIN.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and LDAG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FRIN.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD while LDAG.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRIN.L returned 6.33%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for LDAG.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIN.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LDAG.L.

Performance

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while LDAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDAG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than LDAG.L's 13.10% return.

FRIN.L

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: -5.72%
• 1Y: -5.75%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: —

LDAG.L

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: 13.10%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 29.43%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF	-6.03%	-4.10%	12.61%	14.75%	3.17%	20.22%
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF	13.10%	26.42%	5.50%	3.28%	1.73%	-25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIN.L and LDAG.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	0.33

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FRIN.L	LDAG.L
Financial Services	27.7%	33.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	11.2%
Industrials	10.8%	12.4%
Basic Materials	9.2%	5.7%
Energy	8.9%	3.6%
Technology	8.0%	8.2%
Healthcare	6.7%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	7.0%
Utilities	5.2%	11.3%
Communication Services	4.6%	4.1%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.3%

Return for Risk

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIN.L

FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6

LDAG.L

LDAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LDAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LDAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LDAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LDAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRIN.L	LDAG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	2.09	-2.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	2.85	-3.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.36	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	3.06	-3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	8.13	-8.81

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIN.L and LDAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than LDAG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and LDAG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRIN.L	LDAG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-33.08%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.97%	-9.58%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.37%	-19.89%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.37%	-19.89%	-2.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.67%	-5.40%	-9.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.23%	-19.79%	+12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.47%	3.61%	+4.86%

Volatility

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRIN.L	LDAG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	4.81%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.03%	11.04%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	14.05%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.64%	19.84%	-4.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.38%	22.66%	-3.28%

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LDAG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIN.L vs. LDAG.L - Dividend Comparison

FRIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF	3.98%	4.23%	4.75%	5.40%	4.80%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRIN.L and LDAG.L in my portfolio?

FRIN.L and LDAG.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRIN.L or LDAG.L?

On fees, FRIN.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRIN.L or LDAG.L?

FRIN.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LDAG.L.

What is the main difference between FRIN.L and LDAG.L?

FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while LDAG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.40% for LDAG.L.