FRIN.L vs. INRL.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FRIN.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and INRL.L (Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) are both India Equities funds tracking the MSCI India NR USD, from Franklin Templeton and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRIN.L returned 5.67%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for INRL.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRIN.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INRL.L.

Performance

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while INRL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INRL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -8.21% return, which is significantly higher than INRL.L's -10.19% return.

FRIN.L

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: -6.54%
• YTD: -8.21%
• 1Y: -9.61%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: —

INRL.L

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: -8.25%
• YTD: -10.19%
• 1Y: -12.59%
• 3Y*: 2.35%
• 5Y*: 4.14%
• 10Y*: 6.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF	-8.21%	-4.10%	12.61%	14.75%	3.17%	26.55%	9.19%	-4.64%
INRL.L Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)	-10.19%	-5.74%	11.19%	12.56%	1.46%	25.81%	9.68%	-5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIN.L and INRL.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.97

The correlation between FRIN.L and INRL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FRIN.L	INRL.L
Financial Services	26.8%	28.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	12.5%
Industrials	10.6%	10.7%
Basic Materials	9.8%	8.4%
Energy	8.9%	9.0%
Technology	8.3%	8.2%
Healthcare	6.7%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	6.0%
Utilities	5.5%	4.5%
Communication Services	4.6%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.4%

Return for Risk

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIN.L

FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

INRL.L

INRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
INRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
INRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
INRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRIN.L	INRL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	-0.80	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	-1.08	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.88	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	-0.63	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	-1.25	+0.17

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the INRL.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIN.L and INRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum INRL.L drawdown of -72.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and INRL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRIN.L	INRL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-72.96%	+36.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.97%	-19.97%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.37%	-26.82%	+4.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.37%	-26.82%	+4.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.65%	-21.54%	+4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-16.26%	+8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.88%	10.08%	-1.20%

Volatility

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) is 3.81%, while Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that FRIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRIN.L	INRL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	4.19%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	13.04%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.53%	15.76%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.67%	16.04%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.71%	-0.39%

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INRL.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIN.L vs. INRL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRIN.L nor INRL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRIN.L and INRL.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FRIN.L and INRL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FRIN.L or INRL.L?

On fees, FRIN.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRIN.L or INRL.L?

FRIN.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INRL.L.

What is the main difference between FRIN.L and INRL.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.85% for INRL.L.