PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIMX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIMX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FRIMX having a 4.21% annualized return and FFGZX not far ahead at 4.28%.


FRIMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.27%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.21%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
4.05%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIMX and FFGZX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.95

The correlation between FRIMX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIMX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIMXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.54

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.18

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

14.23

-1.18

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIMX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIMXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.64

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.65

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.97

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.93

-0.38

Drawdowns

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIMX drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIMX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIMXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-14.94%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-3.33%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.97%

-4.76%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-14.94%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.12%

-14.94%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-2.26%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.74%

+0.06%

Volatility

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FRIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIMXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

1.49%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

3.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

4.01%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

5.08%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

4.43%

+0.09%

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIMX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

FRIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.08%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FRIMX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRIMX has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRIMX dropped -33.73% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIMX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer