PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIFX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund (FRIFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIFX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FRIFX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 5.33%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.


FRIFX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.55%
6M
4.09%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
5.33%

FBGRX

1D
0.86%
1M
8.31%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.83%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRIFX
Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund
3.55%7.16%7.93%9.32%-14.54%18.90%-1.09%17.92%-1.80%6.20%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
17.66%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIFX and FBGRX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FRIFX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIFX
FRIFX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FRIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund (FRIFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIFXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

2.67

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

3.42

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.62

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.50

15.38

-4.88

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIFX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIFXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.67

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.92

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Drawdowns

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIFX drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIFX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIFXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.27%

-58.64%

+20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-12.65%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-27.07%

+19.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-43.08%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-43.08%

+8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-12.53%

+8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.98%

-2.21%

Volatility

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund (FRIFX) is 1.18%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FRIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIFXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

4.14%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

12.99%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

17.46%

-13.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.48%

24.88%

-18.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.47%

23.69%

-14.22%

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.61%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
FRIFX
Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund
4.56%4.69%4.65%4.99%6.04%1.47%4.77%5.68%5.08%4.40%4.98%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRIFX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FRIFX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRIFX dropped -38.27% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIFX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer