FRHMX vs. FRQKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FRHMX (Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6) and FRQKX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FRHMX returned 596.10%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for FRQKX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRHMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FRQKX.

Performance

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRHMX achieves a 1,464,383.96% return, which is significantly higher than FRQKX's 3.66% return.

FRHMX

• 1D: 1,410,365.12%
• 1M: 1,421,616.96%
• YTD: 1,464,383.96%
• 6M: 1,464,432.61%
• 1Y: 1,543,480.72%
• 3Y*: 2,494.75%
• 5Y*: 596.10%
• 10Y*: —

FRQKX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 9.22%
• 3Y*: 7.28%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	1,464,383.96%	10.02%	4.50%	8.28%	-11.48%	2.98%	8.79%	3.17%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.66%	9.91%	4.42%	8.62%	-12.30%	3.95%	9.68%	3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FRHMX and FRQKX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.99

The correlation between FRHMX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRHMX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRHMX

FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FRQKX

FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRHMX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.23	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	488,367.03	3.23	+488,363.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	68,097.73	1.45	+68,096.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	470,348.34	2.84	+470,345.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,985,653.35	11.89	+1,985,641.45

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRHMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRHMX and FRQKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRHMX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum FRQKX drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRHMX and FRQKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRHMX	FRQKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-16.97%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-3.42%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.90%	-5.17%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	-16.97%	+1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-3.84%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	0.82%	-0.01%

Volatility

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a higher volatility of 955.41% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 2.02%. This indicates that FRHMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRHMX	FRQKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	955.41%	2.02%	+953.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	955.40%	3.71%	+951.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,413,171.78%	4.37%	+1,413,167.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	631,989.64%	5.60%	+631,984.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	538,904.02%	5.78%	+538,898.24%

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRHMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRHMX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

FRHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.07%, more than FRQKX's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	103.07%	3.22%	3.24%	3.02%	4.77%	3.78%	2.61%	1.95%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.42%	3.09%	2.91%	2.86%	5.12%	6.11%	3.61%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRHMX and FRQKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FRHMX and FRQKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRHMX or FRQKX?

FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to FRQKX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRHMX dropped -15.96% vs FRQKX's -16.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.