PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRHC vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRHC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRHC achieves a 29.45% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 9.13% return.


FRHC

1D
3.16%
1M
9.62%
6M
25.02%
YTD
29.45%
1Y
-11.93%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
65.36%

NVDA

1D
0.23%
1M
-3.52%
6M
9.29%
YTD
9.13%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
66.27%
5Y*
60.07%
10Y*
65.23%
ALL TIME*
36.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRHC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
29.45%-6.89%62.15%38.44%-16.02%35.12%252.89%76.03%29.87%236.51%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
9.13%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FRHC and NVDA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.36

The correlation between FRHC and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRHC:

$9.65B

NVDA:

$4.92T

EPS

FRHC:

$0.04

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

FRHC:

3.62K

NVDA:

31.15

PEG Ratio

FRHC:

317.15

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

FRHC:

4.55

NVDA:

19.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRHC:

$2.12B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRHC:

$1.05B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRHC:

$542.59M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRHC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRHC
FRHC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FRHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRHC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRHCNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.11

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

0.90

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

1.90

-2.40

FRHC vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRHC and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRHC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRHC drawdown since its inception was -45.93%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRHC and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRHCNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.93%

-89.72%

+43.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.08%

-20.21%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.08%

-36.88%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.93%

-66.34%

+20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.16%

-13.67%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-36.10%

+24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.35%

9.50%

+14.85%

Volatility

FRHC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) has a higher volatility of 26.31% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.95%. This indicates that FRHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRHCNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.31%

10.95%

+15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.79%

27.74%

+9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.96%

35.88%

+9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.66%

51.81%

-12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.34%

49.92%

-1.58%

Dividends

FRHC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

FRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

FRHC vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freedom Holding Corp. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
615.57M
81.62B
(FRHC) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRHC vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Freedom Holding Corp. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
57.6%
74.9%
Portfolio components
FRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 354.51M and revenue of 615.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

FRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 199.99M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

FRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a net income of 76.24M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRHC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRHC has higher volatility (26.31%) compared to NVDA (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRHC dropped -45.93% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRHC and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer