PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRGN vs. NVIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRGN vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FRGN having a 20.46% return and NVIR slightly lower at 19.81%.


FRGN

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.38%
6M
11.40%
YTD
20.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NVIR

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.87%
6M
9.16%
YTD
19.81%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.82M$4.12M$1.69M
$13.27K$13.84K$23.31K

FRGN vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FRGN and NVIR is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRGN vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRGN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVIR
NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRGN vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRGNNVIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

FRGN vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRGN vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGN drawdown since its inception was -12.40%, smaller than the maximum NVIR drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGN and NVIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRGNNVIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-22.47%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-4.96%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-4.66%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

Volatility

FRGN vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRGNNVIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

16.92%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

19.25%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

19.25%

+2.70%

FRGN vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NVIR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRGN vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

FRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than NVIR's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FRGN
Horizon International Equity ETF
0.21%0.25%0.00%0.00%
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
0.76%0.92%1.50%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRGN and NVIR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRGN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRGN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.

NVIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.21% for FRGN.

FRGN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NVIR is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FRGN and 0.85% for NVIR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRGN and NVIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer