FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FRGD.L (Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and VHYL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Dividend funds - FRGD.L tracks the LibertyQ Global Dividend Index-NR while VHYL.L tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRGD.L returned 9.46%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for VHYL.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRGD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYL.L.

Performance

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRGD.L is traded in USD, while VHYL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRGD.L achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.L's 13.45% return.

FRGD.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 8.14%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: —

VHYL.L

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 10.08%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 1Y: 27.51%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	11.68%	14.23%	15.42%	10.52%	-9.39%	19.24%	5.56%	23.88%	-8.99%	5.36%
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing	13.45%	27.15%	9.37%	10.81%	-5.37%	18.15%	-0.58%	21.69%	-11.88%	6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGD.L and VHYL.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.80

The correlation between FRGD.L and VHYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGD.L

FRGD.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FRGD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FRGD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FRGD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FRGD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

VHYL.L

VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRGD.L	VHYL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.68	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.81	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.49	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.50	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	12.34	-2.73

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRGD.L and VHYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VHYL.L drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGD.L and VHYL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRGD.L	VHYL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-36.01%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-7.82%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-12.59%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.51%	-21.60%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-0.10%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-5.28%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.22%	-0.23%

Volatility

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 2.21%. This indicates that FRGD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRGD.L	VHYL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	2.21%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	8.34%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	10.25%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.02%	13.20%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.58%	14.40%	+0.18%

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRGD.L vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison

FRGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than VHYL.L's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.50%	2.69%	2.46%	2.73%	3.03%	2.36%	2.41%	3.21%	3.38%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing	2.53%	2.79%	3.08%	3.37%	3.67%	3.08%	3.28%	3.34%	3.63%	3.09%	2.88%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRGD.L and VHYL.L in my portfolio?

FRGD.L and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRGD.L or VHYL.L?

On fees, VHYL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRGD.L or VHYL.L?

VHYL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FRGD.L.

What is the main difference between FRGD.L and VHYL.L?

FRGD.L tracks LibertyQ Global Dividend Index-NR, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FRGD.L and 0.29% for VHYL.L.