FRGAX vs. PRCHX
FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) and PRCHX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FRGAX returned 21.41% vs 13.35% for PRCHX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRGAX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PRCHX.
Performance
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRGAX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than PRCHX's 3.61% return.
FRGAX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRCHX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 8.73% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 4.75% |
PRCHX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I | 3.61% | 13.68% | 8.92% | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRGAX and PRCHX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FRGAX and PRCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRGAX vs. PRCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FRGAX
PRCHX
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRGAX | PRCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.06 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 15.59 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRGAX | PRCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.63 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.83 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRGAX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, which is greater than PRCHX's maximum drawdown of -6.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGAX and PRCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRGAX | PRCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.77% | -6.10% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -4.50% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.40% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.64% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 0.88% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FRGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRGAX | PRCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 1.67% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 4.15% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.05% | 5.24% | +3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 6.51% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 6.51% | +3.80% |
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRGAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCHX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRGAX vs. PRCHX - Dividend Comparison
FRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than PRCHX's 5.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.84% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% |
PRCHX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I | 5.15% | 5.08% | 3.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRGAX and PRCHX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRGAX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to PRCHX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRGAX dropped -11.77% vs PRCHX's -6.10%.
PRCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRGAX and PRCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer