PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRFHF vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRFHF achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than IBHG's 1.60% return.


FRFHF

1D
0.02%
1M
1.93%
6M
-9.87%
YTD
-12.48%
1Y
-6.35%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
32.97%
10Y*
14.16%

IBHG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.47%
6M
1.47%
YTD
1.60%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
-12.48%38.79%53.39%57.56%23.17%12.64%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.60%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FRFHF and IBHG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between FRFHF and IBHG has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRFHF vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRFHF
FRFHF Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FRFHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFHF Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFHF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRFHFIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.42

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

6.14

-6.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

22.50

-23.17

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRFHF Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFHF and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRFHF drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFHF and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRFHFIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-13.85%

-45.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.55%

-0.73%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-3.39%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-13.85%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.87%

0.00%

-12.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-2.61%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.63%

0.20%

+9.43%

Volatility

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.40%. This indicates that FRFHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRFHFIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

0.40%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

1.51%

+15.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

2.01%

+19.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.58%

6.31%

+19.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.11%

6.30%

+20.81%

Dividends

FRFHF vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

FRFHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than IBHG's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
0.91%0.79%1.08%1.09%1.68%2.03%2.93%2.13%2.27%1.89%2.09%2.12%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.03%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRFHF and IBHG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRFHF has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to IBHG (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRFHF dropped -58.92% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRFHF and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer