PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRESX vs. FGOMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRESX achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 20.10% return.


FRESX

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.67%
6M
12.68%
YTD
16.43%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
4.73%
ALL TIME*
8.84%

FGOMX

1D
3.87%
1M
-3.29%
6M
7.90%
YTD
20.10%
1Y
38.55%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FRESX
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio
16.43%2.54%5.87%10.82%-24.36%42.34%-7.93%25.22%-3.10%
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
20.10%34.20%7.88%12.23%-22.45%-0.19%22.10%22.25%-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FRESX and FGOMX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.32

The correlation between FRESX and FGOMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRESX vs. FGOMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRESX
FRESX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FGOMX
FGOMX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FGOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRESXFGOMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.27

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

10.05

-3.84

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRESX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRESX and FGOMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRESX drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, which is greater than FGOMX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRESX and FGOMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRESXFGOMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.34%

-40.14%

-36.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.78%

-13.54%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.44%

-16.71%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.13%

-35.80%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-10.19%

+8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-13.20%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

4.12%

-1.59%

Volatility

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX) is 4.33%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) has a volatility of 9.18%. This indicates that FRESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRESXFGOMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

9.18%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

20.68%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

23.69%

-9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

18.85%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.81%

+0.81%

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRESX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRESX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

FRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than FGOMX's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
6.94%2.17%2.40%2.83%2.42%4.63%0.73%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRESX
Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio
4.03%4.64%5.58%6.95%10.16%3.70%4.77%6.91%4.23%4.00%4.90%6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRESX and FGOMX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGOMX has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to FRESX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRESX dropped -76.34% vs FGOMX's -40.14%.

FGOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRESX and FGOMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer