FRES.L vs. IBKR
FRES.L (Fresnillo plc) and IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) are both stocks. FRES.L operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, FRES.L returned 12.24%/yr vs 26.19%/yr for IBKR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FRES.L is traded in GBp, while IBKR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBKR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRES.L achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 37.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L has underperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 12.24%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively higher 26.19% annualized return.
FRES.L
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -15.40%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 132.30%
- 3Y*
- 70.02%
- 5Y*
- 32.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
IBKR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 37.44%
- 6M
- 33.07%
- 1Y
- 74.13%
- 3Y*
- 61.25%
- 5Y*
- 42.23%
- 10Y*
- 26.19%
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | -7.34% | 468.21% | 6.13% | -32.98% | 3.90% | -18.79% | 78.92% | -24.01% | -38.26% | 18.98% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 37.44% | 35.95% | 118.18% | 9.38% | 2.54% | 32.36% | 27.84% | -17.28% | -1.62% | 49.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRES.L and IBKR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.04 |
The correlation between FRES.L and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FRES.L:
£22.27B
IBKR:
$38.71B
FRES.L:
£2.08
IBKR:
$3.76
FRES.L:
14.56
IBKR:
22.99
FRES.L:
0.07
IBKR:
0.79
FRES.L:
2.77
IBKR:
4.43
FRES.L:
4.80
IBKR:
1.82
FRES.L:
£8.03B
IBKR:
$8.69B
FRES.L:
£3.75B
IBKR:
$7.75B
FRES.L:
£3.90B
IBKR:
$7.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRES.L vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank
FRES.L
IBKR
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRES.L | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 4.60 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | 10.33 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRES.L | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.01 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.23 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.78 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.54 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRES.L drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRES.L and IBKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRES.L | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -51.26% | -31.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.37% | -16.19% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.85% | -39.29% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.75% | -39.29% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.56% | -47.70% | -26.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.55% | -0.67% | -29.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -19.65% | -23.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 7.20% | +6.33% |
Volatility
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison
Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 10.26%. This indicates that FRES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRES.L | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 10.26% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.01% | 26.14% | +15.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.99% | 37.21% | +17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.40% | 34.46% | +7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 33.63% | +9.77% |
Dividends
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison
FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than IBKR's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 3.15% | 2.00% | 1.36% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 1.00% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.92% |
Financials
FRES.L vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresnillo plc and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FRES.L and IBKR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FRES.L and IBKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer