FREM.L vs. FRGD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FREM.L (Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF) and FRGD.L (Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FREM.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF, while FRGD.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FREM.L returned 7.07%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for FRGD.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FREM.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FRGD.L.

Performance

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L) and Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREM.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than FRGD.L's 11.68% return.

FREM.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -3.28%
• 6M: 9.24%
• YTD: 13.22%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: —

FRGD.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 8.73%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FREM.L Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF	13.22%	27.77%	6.27%	12.53%	-19.30%	7.08%	1.89%	11.43%	-11.32%	3.35%
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	11.68%	14.23%	15.42%	10.52%	-9.39%	19.24%	5.56%	23.88%	-8.99%	2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FREM.L and FRGD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017	0.66

The correlation between FREM.L and FRGD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREM.L

FREM.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
FREM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FREM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FREM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FREM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FREM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FRGD.L

FRGD.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FRGD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FRGD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FRGD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FRGD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L) and Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FREM.L	FRGD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.89	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.75	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.74	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	9.61	-2.93

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FREM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREM.L and FRGD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREM.L drawdown since its inception was -39.05%, which is greater than FRGD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREM.L and FRGD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FREM.L	FRGD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.05%	-35.03%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-6.95%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-12.61%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.99%	-22.51%	-7.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.94%	-0.80%	-3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.95%	-5.16%	-5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.99%	+1.41%

Volatility

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF (FREM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that FREM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FREM.L	FRGD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	2.84%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	7.99%	+5.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.54%	10.11%	+5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	13.02%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	14.58%	+2.36%

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FREM.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FREM.L vs. FRGD.L - Dividend Comparison

FREM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FREM.L Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	2.50%	2.69%	2.46%	2.73%	3.03%	2.36%	2.41%	3.21%	3.38%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FREM.L and FRGD.L in my portfolio?

FREM.L and FRGD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FREM.L or FRGD.L?

On fees, FRGD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FREM.L or FRGD.L?

FRGD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FREM.L.

What is the main difference between FREM.L and FRGD.L?

FREM.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FRGD.L is Dividend. FREM.L tracks Franklin EM Multi-Factor Equity UCITS ETF, while FRGD.L tracks Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FREM.L and 0.30% for FRGD.L.