FRDPX vs. TEMZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX).
FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987. TEMZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Oct 1, 2006.
Performance
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | -4.58% | 11.96% | 10.92% | 12.10% | -10.69% | 26.62% | 16.29% | 29.83% | -5.27% | 17.33% |
TEMZX Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | -2.70% | 10.91% | 7.92% | 13.57% | -18.99% | 23.64% | 9.92% | 5.80% | -14.72% | 31.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than TEMZX's -2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has outperformed TEMZX with an annualized return of 10.53%, while TEMZX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.96% annualized return.
FRDPX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
TEMZX
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TEMZX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRDPX vs. TEMZX — Risk / Return Rank
FRDPX
TEMZX
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDPX | TEMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.07 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 2.86 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDPX | TEMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.29 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.42 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.29 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDPX and TEMZX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Dividend Comparison
FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than TEMZX's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 10.74% | 10.25% | 10.15% | 4.60% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 0.82% | 3.01% | 5.20% | 0.90% | 3.09% | 5.30% |
TEMZX Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | 1.42% | 1.39% | 0.52% | 3.14% | 8.03% | 10.93% | 2.81% | 1.82% | 2.86% | 0.12% | 2.02% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, smaller than the maximum TEMZX drawdown of -69.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and TEMZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDPX | TEMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.57% | -69.98% | +18.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -10.50% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.07% | -29.26% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -48.59% | +13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -10.50% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -12.81% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.79% | -0.53% |
Volatility
FRDPX vs. TEMZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) is 3.46%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that FRDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRDPX | TEMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 5.80% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 8.23% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 12.33% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 13.58% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 14.17% | +2.99% |