PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDM vs. IYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDM vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 26.86% return, which is significantly higher than IYZ's 18.92% return.


FRDM

1D
-0.48%
1M
-14.88%
6M
16.73%
YTD
26.86%
1Y
62.81%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.82%

IYZ

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.80%
6M
19.38%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
24.26%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
4.05%
ALL TIME*
1.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDM vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
26.86%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.23%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
18.92%29.28%20.53%3.90%-30.29%11.69%4.13%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and IYZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019

0.52

The correlation between FRDM and IYZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDM vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDM vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDMIYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.91

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

10.01

+2.44

FRDM vs. IYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the IYZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDM and IYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and IYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDMIYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-77.11%

+36.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.87%

-12.60%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-13.85%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

-39.74%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.99%

-12.60%

-2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-39.99%

+32.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

3.66%

+1.40%

Volatility

FRDM vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison

Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) at 6.35%. This indicates that FRDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDMIYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

6.35%

+6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.60%

16.50%

+11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.70%

19.53%

+10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.10%

19.07%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

19.31%

+4.17%

FRDM vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDM vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than IYZ's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.71%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.76%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDM and IYZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDM has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to IYZ (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDM dropped -40.49% vs IYZ's -77.11%.

On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 16.96% vs 6.03% for IYZ. On fees, IYZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 16.96% return vs 6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.71% for FRDM.

FRDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IYZ is Communications Equities. FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.42% for IYZ.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDM and IYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer