PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDAX vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDAX achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMECX's 7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDAX has outperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


FRDAX

1D
0.05%
1M
2.06%
6M
5.68%
YTD
6.77%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

AMECX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.73%
6M
3.61%
YTD
7.34%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
6.77%12.24%11.20%12.37%-10.45%26.93%16.58%30.16%-5.04%20.09%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
7.34%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDAX and AMECX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.88

The correlation between FRDAX and AMECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDAX vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDAX
FRDAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FRDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDAXAMECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.08

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

7.60

-1.71

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDAX and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDAX drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than AMECX's maximum drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDAX and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDAXAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.38%

-41.92%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-6.13%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-8.58%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-15.78%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-26.13%

-8.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.36%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-4.44%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.68%

+0.15%

Volatility

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) at 1.86%. This indicates that FRDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDAXAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

1.86%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

5.81%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

7.43%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

9.43%

+5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

10.63%

+6.47%

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDAX vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

FRDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than AMECX's 9.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.38%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
9.85%10.53%10.44%4.85%5.23%4.65%1.04%3.25%5.49%3.23%3.27%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDAX and AMECX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDAX has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to AMECX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDAX dropped -51.38% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

AMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDAX and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer