PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCK.DE achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than HY3M.DE's 6.33% return.


FRCK.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.75%
6M
1.85%
YTD
1.70%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
8.11%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.10%

HY3M.DE

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.72%
YTD
6.33%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FRCK.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.70%12.79%5.41%9.66%-22.04%-3.92%2.79%11.10%-4.36%
HY3M.DE
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
6.33%-3.30%18.25%4.13%-7.66%7.35%-3.67%17.71%-14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.00

The correlation between FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCK.DE
FRCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HY3M.DE
HY3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRCK.DEHY3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.41

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

10.01

-0.92

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than HY3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRCK.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-21.08%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-3.08%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-12.09%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-13.58%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.17%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-7.04%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.05%

+0.03%

Volatility

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) is 0.93%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that FRCK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HY3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRCK.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

1.97%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

5.14%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

6.85%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.03%

8.61%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

13.20%

-3.91%

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCK.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HY3M.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRCK.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRCK.DE nor HY3M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HY3M.DE.

FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged), while HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FRCK.DE and 0.40% for HY3M.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRCK.DE and HY3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer