FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE
FRCK.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and CEB0.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - FRCK.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged) while CEB0.DE tracks the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FRCK.DE returned 10.92% vs 1.59% for CEB0.DE. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRCK.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CEB0.DE.
Performance
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FRCK.DE having a 1.67% return and CEB0.DE slightly lower at 1.63%.
FRCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 1.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 1.67% | 12.81% | 4.19% |
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.63% | 0.43% | 6.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRCK.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FRCK.DE
CEB0.DE
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRCK.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.43 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 3.02 | +7.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRCK.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.94 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 2.03 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCK.DE and CEB0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRCK.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -1.83% | -30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.49% | -1.11% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.34% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -0.38% | -8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.52% | +0.56% |
Volatility
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 1.02%. This indicates that FRCK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRCK.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 1.02% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 1.45% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 1.68% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.01% | 2.03% | +6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 2.03% | +7.26% |
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRCK.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CEB0.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRCK.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison
FRCK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.81% | 1.84% | 1.43% |
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRCK.DE and CEB0.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CEB0.DE.
FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged), while CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FRCK.DE and 0.40% for CEB0.DE.
Find the right allocation for FRCK.DE and CEB0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer