FRBSX vs. RSVAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FRBSX (Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund) and RSVAX (Victory RS Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FRBSX returned 8.75%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for RSVAX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FRBSX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RSVAX.

Performance

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRBSX having a 10.62% return and RSVAX slightly higher at 10.72%. Over the past 10 years, FRBSX has underperformed RSVAX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while RSVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.

FRBSX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 6.32%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 1Y: 14.84%
• 3Y*: 10.09%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 8.75%
• ALL TIME*: 11.03%

RSVAX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 7.01%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 1Y: 16.59%
• 3Y*: 9.70%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 9.29%
• ALL TIME*: 7.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund	10.62%	6.57%	10.78%	9.00%	-6.81%	26.62%	-2.40%	24.53%	-12.64%	12.50%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	10.72%	4.58%	12.58%	7.63%	-2.98%	27.30%	-2.60%	31.36%	-10.84%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FRBSX and RSVAX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994	0.76

The correlation between FRBSX and RSVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRBSX vs. RSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRBSX

FRBSX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FRBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FRBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FRBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FRBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FRBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

RSVAX

RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRBSX	RSVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.18	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.79	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.21	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	1.79	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	6.29	-2.68

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the RSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRBSX and RSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRBSX drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than RSVAX's maximum drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBSX and RSVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRBSX	RSVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.47%	-59.23%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-7.81%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.29%	-17.98%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-23.58%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.69%	-43.49%	-0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.04%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.10%	-13.75%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	2.24%	+1.25%

Volatility

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) at 3.07%. This indicates that FRBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRBSX	RSVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.07%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	8.20%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	11.88%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	17.92%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	19.16%	+0.07%

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRBSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than RSVAX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRBSX vs. RSVAX - Dividend Comparison

FRBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than RSVAX's 7.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund	4.16%	4.60%	8.44%	2.32%	4.39%	13.02%	3.71%	7.88%	16.87%	8.07%	6.60%	17.29%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	7.98%	8.83%	9.89%	6.48%	6.33%	14.14%	1.93%	7.38%	15.47%	25.04%	12.47%	9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRBSX and RSVAX in my portfolio?

FRBSX and RSVAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRBSX or RSVAX?

FRBSX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to RSVAX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBSX dropped -63.47% vs RSVAX's -59.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.