FRBSX vs. GTTMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FRBSX (Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund) and GTTMX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FRBSX returned 8.57%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for GTTMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRBSX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for GTTMX.

Performance

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRBSX achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than GTTMX's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBSX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 8.57%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.

FRBSX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 13.84%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

GTTMX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 29.25%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 12.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund	7.51%	6.57%	10.78%	9.00%	-6.81%	26.62%	-2.40%	24.53%	-12.64%	12.50%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	13.18%	18.40%	14.84%	9.39%	-13.90%	41.28%	5.12%	24.18%	-11.99%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FRBSX and GTTMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.90

The correlation between FRBSX and GTTMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRBSX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRBSX

FRBSX Risk / Return Rank: 15
FRBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FRBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FRBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FRBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FRBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

GTTMX

GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRBSX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.98	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.74	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	4.51	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.87	15.20	-11.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRBSX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRBSX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.98	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.55	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.60	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.42	+0.22

Drawdowns

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRBSX drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than GTTMX's maximum drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBSX and GTTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRBSX	GTTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.47%	-56.24%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-6.51%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.29%	-20.62%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-24.12%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.69%	-44.59%	+0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.10%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-10.25%	+2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	1.92%	+1.60%

Volatility

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRBSX	GTTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.96%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.79%	10.84%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	14.84%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	18.32%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	20.50%	-1.18%

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRBSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRBSX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

FRBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than GTTMX's 16.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund	4.28%	4.60%	8.44%	2.32%	4.39%	13.02%	3.71%	7.88%	16.87%	8.07%	6.60%	17.29%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	16.65%	18.85%	14.45%	5.83%	0.40%	17.50%	11.58%	5.95%	9.88%	3.00%	0.55%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRBSX and GTTMX in my portfolio?

FRBSX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRBSX or GTTMX?

FRBSX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to GTTMX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBSX dropped -63.47% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.