PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRASX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRASX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 15.07% return.


FRASX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.38%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
5.73%

FFSZX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.07%
6M
15.13%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
4.26%11.05%5.18%9.62%-13.50%5.33%10.89%4.94%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
15.07%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FRASX and FFSZX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.87

The correlation between FRASX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRASX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRASX
FRASX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRASXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.32

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

14.57

-2.83

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRASX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRASX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRASX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRASXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-31.00%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-9.77%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-15.36%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-27.17%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-5.78%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.22%

-1.29%

Volatility

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) is 2.05%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that FRASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRASXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

5.85%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

11.75%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

13.73%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

15.19%

-8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

17.11%

-10.75%

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRASX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRASX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FFSZX's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
4.98%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
3.04%2.51%2.88%2.67%4.93%5.21%3.38%3.23%6.32%24.29%2.17%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRASX and FFSZX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSZX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to FRASX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRASX dropped -40.08% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRASX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer