FRA vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
FRA is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 29, 2003. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
FRA vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRA vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc | -3.38% | -3.75% | 21.56% | 25.46% | -10.59% | 17.81% | -2.38% | 20.82% | -8.27% | 0.76% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -9.12% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 38.22% | -1.21% | 31.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRA achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FRA has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 6.61%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.
FRA
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- -3.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
NASDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRA vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRA has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRA vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
FRA
NASDX
FRA vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRA | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | 0.88 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | 1.40 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.20 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.31 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 5.01 | -5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRA | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 0.88 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.63 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRA and NASDX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FRA vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
FRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than NASDX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc | 13.49% | 12.62% | 10.81% | 10.44% | 6.88% | 5.96% | 7.61% | 6.44% | 6.90% | 5.31% | 5.65% | 6.17% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.93% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
FRA vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRA drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRA and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRA | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.43% | -83.16% | +31.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -12.70% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.77% | -35.33% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.80% | -35.33% | -7.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.62% | -11.90% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -34.59% | +27.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.44% | 3.32% | +3.12% |
Volatility
FRA vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 5.38%. This indicates that FRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRA | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 5.38% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 12.45% | -4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 22.55% | -8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 23.03% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 22.61% | -7.12% |