FRA vs. HYSA
FRA (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc) and HYSA (Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF) are both funds - FRA is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while HYSA is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by BondBloxx. Over the past year, FRA returned -2.59% vs 6.36% for HYSA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRA charges 2.17%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for HYSA.
Performance
FRA vs. HYSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRA achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than HYSA's 1.26% return.
FRA
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- -2.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.38%
HYSA
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRA vs. HYSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc | -1.74% | -3.75% | 21.56% | 4.02% |
HYSA Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF | 1.26% | 8.37% | 6.71% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRA and HYSA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRA vs. HYSA — Risk / Return Rank
FRA
HYSA
FRA vs. HYSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRA | HYSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.03 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 8.16 | -8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRA | HYSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 1.37 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.37 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
FRA vs. HYSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRA drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, which is greater than HYSA's maximum drawdown of -4.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRA and HYSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRA | HYSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.43% | -4.90% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -3.15% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.11% | -0.27% | -9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -0.68% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 0.78% | +6.73% |
Volatility
FRA vs. HYSA - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) at 1.28%. This indicates that FRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRA | HYSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.28% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 3.55% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.96% | 4.68% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 6.08% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 6.08% | +9.44% |
FRA vs. HYSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRA has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRA vs. HYSA - Dividend Comparison
FRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than HYSA's 6.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc | 13.56% | 12.62% | 10.81% | 10.44% | 6.88% | 5.96% | 7.61% | 6.44% | 6.90% | 5.31% | 5.65% | 6.17% |
HYSA Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF | 6.76% | 6.70% | 6.99% | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRA and HYSA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRA has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to HYSA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRA dropped -51.43% vs HYSA's -4.90%.
HYSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRA and HYSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer