PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRA vs. HYSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRA vs. HYSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRA achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than HYSA's 1.26% return.


FRA

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-1.53%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.38%

HYSA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRA vs. HYSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
-1.74%-3.75%21.56%4.02%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
1.26%8.37%6.71%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FRA and HYSA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRA vs. HYSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRA
FRA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRA vs. HYSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRAHYSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.25

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

2.03

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

8.16

-8.50

FRA vs. HYSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the HYSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRA and HYSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRAHYSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

1.37

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.37

-1.06

Drawdowns

FRA vs. HYSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRA drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, which is greater than HYSA's maximum drawdown of -4.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRA and HYSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRAHYSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.43%

-4.90%

-46.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-3.15%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.11%

-0.27%

-9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-0.68%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

0.78%

+6.73%

Volatility

FRA vs. HYSA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) at 1.28%. This indicates that FRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRAHYSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.28%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

3.55%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

4.68%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

6.08%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

6.08%

+9.44%

FRA vs. HYSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRA has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRA vs. HYSA - Dividend Comparison

FRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than HYSA's 6.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
13.56%12.62%10.81%10.44%6.88%5.96%7.61%6.44%6.90%5.31%5.65%6.17%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.76%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRA and HYSA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRA has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to HYSA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRA dropped -51.43% vs HYSA's -4.90%.

HYSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRA and HYSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer