FQTIX vs. FRDPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX).

FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019. FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987.

Performance

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	0.52%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	8.51%	3.68%	4.11%
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	-4.58%	11.96%	10.92%	12.10%	-10.69%	26.62%	16.29%	15.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's -4.58% return.

FQTIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 2.66%
• 1Y: 9.72%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: —

FRDPX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -7.10%
• YTD: -4.58%
• 6M: -3.87%
• 1Y: 8.41%
• 3Y*: 8.63%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.

FRDPX

Franklin Rising Dividends Fund

FQTIX

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I

Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FRDPX

FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQTIX	FRDPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	0.63	+1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	1.03	+2.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.14	+0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	0.74	+3.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.15	3.45	+13.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and FRDPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQTIX	FRDPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	0.63	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.50	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.60	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and FRDPX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, less than FRDPX's 10.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	7.03%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund	10.74%	10.25%	10.15%	4.60%	4.96%	4.42%	0.82%	3.01%	5.20%	0.90%	3.09%	5.30%

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and FRDPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQTIX	FRDPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.62%	-51.57%	+26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.41%	-10.54%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.81%	-21.07%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-7.10%	+5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-5.84%	+1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	2.26%	-1.72%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) is 1.57%, while Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that FQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQTIX	FRDPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	3.46%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.38%	7.49%	-5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	15.22%	-11.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	15.36%	-9.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.80%	17.16%	-9.36%