PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQT.DE vs. H.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Frequentis AG (FQT.DE) and Hydro One Limited (H.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FQT.DE is traded in EUR, while H.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the H.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQT.DE achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than H.TO's 3.42% return.


FQT.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
5.91%
6M
10.78%
1Y
63.56%
3Y*
37.14%
5Y*
25.86%
10Y*

H.TO

1D
-1.77%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
3.42%
6M
7.51%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQT.DE
Frequentis AG
5.91%172.13%-0.66%-3.80%7.41%48.15%-9.09%12.82%
H.TO
Hydro One Limited
3.42%17.04%12.78%12.23%13.59%27.82%11.38%21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FQT.DE and H.TO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.01

The correlation between FQT.DE and H.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQT.DE vs. H.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQT.DE
FQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

H.TO
H.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
H.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
H.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
H.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
H.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frequentis AG (FQT.DE) and Hydro One Limited (H.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQT.DEH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.27

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

3.50

+0.63

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the H.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQT.DE and H.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQT.DEH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

0.90

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.86

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Drawdowns

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum H.TO drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQT.DE and H.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQT.DEH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-33.01%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.60%

-10.18%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.60%

-12.43%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.34%

-16.58%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.52%

-9.36%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-7.73%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.34%

3.71%

+11.63%

Volatility

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Volatility Comparison

Frequentis AG (FQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 21.71% compared to Hydro One Limited (H.TO) at 5.32%. This indicates that FQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQT.DEH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.71%

5.32%

+16.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.07%

11.55%

+26.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.61%

14.43%

+43.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.42%

16.70%

+20.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.06%

18.20%

+16.86%

Dividends

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Dividend Comparison

FQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than H.TO's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQT.DE
Frequentis AG
0.35%0.37%0.89%0.81%0.70%0.56%0.82%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H.TO
Hydro One Limited
2.37%2.40%2.80%2.94%3.05%3.20%3.50%3.81%4.49%3.88%4.11%

Financials

FQT.DE vs. H.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frequentis AG and Hydro One Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FQT.DE values in EUR, H.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


FQT.DE and H.TO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQT.DE and H.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer