FQIPX vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FQIPX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FQIPX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSKAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FQIPX returned 10.60%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for FSKAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FQIPX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIPX achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 10.81% return.

FQIPX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 11.64%
• 1Y: 27.71%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: —

FSKAX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 27.57%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 15.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FQIPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier	11.77%	21.43%	16.55%	19.98%	-18.13%	15.95%	23.50%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	10.81%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FQIPX and FSKAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020	0.96

The correlation between FQIPX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FQIPX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIPX

FQIPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FQIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FQIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FQIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FQIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FQIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FQIPX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.13	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.88	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.08	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	13.71	-0.45

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIPX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIPX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIPX and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQIPX	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.16%	-35.01%	+8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-8.92%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-19.43%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.16%	-25.39%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.14%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-4.01%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.00%	+0.06%

Volatility

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 5.01% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQIPX	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	4.91%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.19%	10.16%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.22%	12.88%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	17.51%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.27%	18.50%	-4.23%

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIPX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FQIPX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FQIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than FSKAX's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQIPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier	1.96%	2.08%	4.09%	2.00%	2.10%	2.05%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.94%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQIPX and FSKAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FQIPX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FQIPX or FSKAX?

FQIPX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FSKAX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQIPX dropped -26.16% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.