FQCHX vs. NHMFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQCHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH) and NHMFX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, FQCHX returned 1.41%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NHMFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQCHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NHMFX.

Performance

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQCHX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than NHMFX's 3.20% return.

FQCHX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

NHMFX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: 10.11%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 1.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	2.42%	4.96%	8.85%	4.90%	-13.94%	6.00%	4.25%	4.13%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	3.20%	3.21%	5.23%	6.74%	-14.90%	9.94%	3.33%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FQCHX and NHMFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.84

The correlation between FQCHX and NHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FQCHX vs. NHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQCHX

FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

NHMFX

NHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQCHX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.25	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.60	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.51	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.83	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.70	8.46	+2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQCHX and NHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQCHX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.25	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.15	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.50	-0.07

Drawdowns

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQCHX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, smaller than the maximum NHMFX drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQCHX and NHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQCHX	NHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	-22.25%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-3.58%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.54%	-10.89%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.05%	-21.55%	+0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-4.87%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	1.19%	-0.44%

Volatility

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) is 1.32%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that FQCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQCHX	NHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	1.55%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	3.16%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	4.52%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.65%	6.87%	-1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.57%	6.76%	-0.19%

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NHMFX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQCHX vs. NHMFX - Dividend Comparison

FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than NHMFX's 6.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	5.48%	7.32%	6.12%	3.92%	4.22%	3.39%	3.35%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	6.13%	6.59%	5.35%	6.99%	5.68%	4.71%	5.05%	5.03%	5.46%	5.37%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQCHX and NHMFX in my portfolio?

FQCHX and NHMFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQCHX or NHMFX?

NHMFX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to FQCHX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQCHX dropped -21.05% vs NHMFX's -22.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.