NHMFX vs. NHMRX
NHMFX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6) and NHMRX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds from Nuveen. Over the past 5 years, NHMFX returned 0.93%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for NHMRX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NHMFX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NHMRX.
Performance
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NHMFX having a 3.49% return and NHMRX slightly lower at 3.47%.
NHMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
NHMRX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 | 3.49% | 3.21% | 5.23% | 6.74% | -14.90% | 9.94% | 3.33% | 12.18% | 2.05% | 12.17% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 3.47% | 2.75% | 5.62% | 7.31% | -14.96% | 9.93% | 3.25% | 12.59% | 2.06% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHMFX and NHMRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.97 |
The correlation between NHMFX and NHMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHMFX vs. NHMRX — Risk / Return Rank
NHMFX
NHMRX
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHMFX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.50 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.64 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 7.99 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHMFX drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum NHMRX drawdown of -45.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMFX and NHMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHMFX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -45.45% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.58% | -3.58% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.66% | -10.19% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -21.52% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -5.32% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.18% | +0.01% |
Volatility
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) at 1.03%. This indicates that NHMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHMFX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 1.03% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 3.06% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 4.40% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.87% | 6.85% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.75% | 6.73% | +0.02% |
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHMFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NHMRX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHMFX vs. NHMRX - Dividend Comparison
NHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than NHMRX's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 | 6.12% | 6.59% | 5.35% | 6.99% | 5.68% | 4.71% | 5.05% | 5.03% | 5.46% | 5.37% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 5.61% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 7.34% | 5.64% | 4.69% | 5.03% | 5.39% | 5.47% | 5.38% | 5.88% | 5.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, NHMFX and NHMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NHMFX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to NHMRX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHMFX dropped -22.25% vs NHMRX's -45.45%.
NHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NHMFX and NHMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer