PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQCHX vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FQCHX having a 1.34% return and HIMFX slightly lower at 1.32%.


FQCHX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.18%
6M
1.09%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%

HIMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.06%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
1.34%4.96%8.85%4.90%-13.94%6.00%4.25%4.13%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
1.32%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%4.74%3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FQCHX and HIMFX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.86

The correlation between FQCHX and HIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQCHX vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FQCHX
FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQCHXHIMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.39

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

8.17

+1.76

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQCHX and HIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQCHX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, which is greater than HIMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQCHX and HIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQCHXHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.05%

-17.57%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-2.76%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.69%

-6.14%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-17.48%

-3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-2.06%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-3.12%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.81%

-0.12%

Volatility

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) have volatilities of 0.92% and 0.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQCHXHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

2.36%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

3.01%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.67%

4.85%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.51%

4.57%

+1.94%

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQCHX vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than HIMFX's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
5.11%7.32%6.12%3.92%4.22%3.39%3.35%3.17%0.00%0.00%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
3.92%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQCHX and HIMFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQCHX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to HIMFX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQCHX dropped -21.05% vs HIMFX's -17.57%.

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQCHX and HIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer