FQCHX vs. EMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQCHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH) and EMO (ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - FQCHX is a High Yield Muni fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while EMO is a MLPs fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FQCHX returned 1.41%/yr vs 26.12%/yr for EMO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FQCHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for EMO.

Performance

FQCHX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQCHX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 15.80% return.

FQCHX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

EMO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 14.62%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 26.12%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQCHX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	2.42%	4.96%	8.85%	4.90%	-13.94%	6.00%	4.25%	4.13%
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	15.80%	7.38%	44.45%	31.76%	40.13%	74.70%	-64.47%	-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FQCHX and EMO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.00

The correlation between FQCHX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FQCHX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQCHX

FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

EMO

EMO Risk / Return Rank: 20
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQCHX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQCHX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.27	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	1.86	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.24	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	1.94	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.70	4.29	+6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQCHX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQCHX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQCHX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	1.27	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.98	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.11	+0.33

Drawdowns

FQCHX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQCHX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQCHX and EMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQCHX	EMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	-95.06%	+74.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-10.87%	+8.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.54%	-18.81%	+10.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.05%	-28.59%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-93.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.64%	+6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-31.96%	+26.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	4.90%	-4.15%

Volatility

FQCHX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) is 1.32%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that FQCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQCHX	EMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	6.24%	-4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	12.32%	-9.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	16.62%	-13.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.65%	26.74%	-21.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.57%	41.25%	-34.68%

FQCHX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQCHX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than EMO's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	8.61%	9.41%	7.16%	6.79%	6.71%	6.71%	15.82%	10.94%	16.39%	10.85%	9.76%	11.88%
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	5.48%	7.32%	6.12%	3.92%	4.22%	3.39%	3.35%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQCHX and EMO in my portfolio?

FQCHX and EMO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQCHX or EMO?

EMO has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to FQCHX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQCHX dropped -21.05% vs EMO's -95.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.