FQAL vs. FADMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX).

FQAL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. FADMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994.

Performance

FQAL vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FQAL vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	-3.61%	16.93%	21.92%	24.20%	-19.70%	32.13%	16.17%	28.12%	-3.54%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	-0.89%	9.01%	6.07%	9.55%	-11.84%	3.46%	6.72%	11.06%	-2.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's -0.89% return.

FQAL

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -5.34%
• YTD: -3.61%
• 6M: -2.20%
• 1Y: 14.58%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —

FADMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 6M: 0.47%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 6.77%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQAL vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.

FADMX

Fidelity Strategic Income Fund

FQAL

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

Return for Risk

FQAL vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL

FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 57
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FADMX

FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQAL	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.14	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.98	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.43	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.88	-1.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	11.44	-4.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQAL vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and FADMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQAL	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	2.14	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.64	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.77	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and FADMX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FQAL vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FADMX's 4.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	1.25%	1.12%	1.20%	1.35%	1.52%	1.17%	1.46%	1.55%	1.73%	1.53%	0.43%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	4.06%	4.33%	4.21%	4.31%	2.91%	4.23%	3.82%	4.34%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and FADMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQAL	FADMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-15.98%	-17.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-2.62%	-8.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-15.98%	-9.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.04%	-2.62%	-3.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-3.12%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	0.66%	+1.73%

Volatility

FQAL vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) at 1.54%. This indicates that FQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQAL	FADMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	1.54%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	2.38%	+6.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	3.54%	+13.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	4.44%	+11.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	4.77%	+12.91%