FADMX vs. LCCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX).
FADMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994. LCCMX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 14, 2005.
Performance
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | -0.89% | 9.01% | 6.07% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -2.02% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | -2.35% | 9.73% | 18.51% | 13.73% | -13.30% | 1.30% | 7.52% | 0.65% | 1.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FADMX achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than LCCMX's -2.35% return.
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LCCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FADMX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FADMX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FADMX
LCCMX
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FADMX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 1.46 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 2.64 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.61 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 5.71 | +5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FADMX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.46 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.84 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.76 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FADMX and LCCMX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison
FADMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than LCCMX's 8.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.06% | 4.33% | 4.21% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 8.33% | 8.93% | 10.39% | 8.55% | 5.68% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.75% |
Drawdowns
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FADMX drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FADMX and LCCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FADMX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -24.57% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -3.76% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.98% | -19.20% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -3.76% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -2.81% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.06% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FADMX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FADMX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.55% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 3.50% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 4.25% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 5.78% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 6.30% | -1.53% |