FPXS.L vs. PADV.L
FPXS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and PADV.L (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FPXS.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while PADV.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPXS.L returned 5.50%/yr vs 5.22%/yr for PADV.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPXS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PADV.L.
Performance
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPXS.L achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than PADV.L's 3.65% return.
FPXS.L
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- —
PADV.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 13.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 6.75% | 11.73% | 5.79% | 0.21% | 5.01% | 6.21% | 0.87% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 3.65% | 14.61% | 6.60% | 9.29% | -5.74% | 3.20% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPXS.L and PADV.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FPXS.L and PADV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Basic Materials
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Industrials
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Real Estate
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Consumer Cyclical
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Energy
FPXS.L
PADV.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Healthcare
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Communication Services
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Utilities
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Technology
FPXS.L
PADV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L — Risk / Return Rank
FPXS.L
PADV.L
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FPXS.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPXS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.87 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 4.60 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPXS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum PADV.L drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXS.L and PADV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPXS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -27.09% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -7.01% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.15% | -10.60% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.15% | -20.25% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -4.84% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -5.65% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.87% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FPXS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that FPXS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPXS.L | PADV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.49% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 8.83% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 11.24% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 13.03% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 14.63% | -0.59% |
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPXS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PADV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPXS.L vs. PADV.L - Dividend Comparison
FPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.89% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 3.44% | 2.91% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 2.14% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPXS.L and PADV.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FPXS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PADV.L.
FPXS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while PADV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FPXS.L and 0.55% for PADV.L.
Find the right allocation for FPXS.L and PADV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer