PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FPXS.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FPXS.L is traded in GBP, while HMXJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMXJ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXS.L achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than HMXJ.L's 9.42% return.


FPXS.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.44%
YTD
7.73%
6M
8.94%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*

HMXJ.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.87%
YTD
9.42%
6M
10.64%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FPXS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
7.73%11.73%5.79%0.21%5.01%6.21%0.87%
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
9.42%12.37%6.43%0.38%5.35%5.41%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXS.L and HMXJ.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.96

The correlation between FPXS.L and HMXJ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXS.L
HMXJ.L

Financial Services

47.7%
45.1%

Basic Materials

15.5%
16.1%

Industrials

9.0%
8.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
6.3%

Energy

3.8%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.0%

Healthcare

2.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.6%

Utilities

2.2%
3.5%

Technology

0.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

FPXS.L
47.7%
HMXJ.L
45.1%

Basic Materials

FPXS.L
15.5%
HMXJ.L
16.1%

Industrials

FPXS.L
9.0%
HMXJ.L
8.5%

Real Estate

FPXS.L
6.7%
HMXJ.L
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FPXS.L
5.7%
HMXJ.L
6.3%

Energy

FPXS.L
3.8%
HMXJ.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

FPXS.L
3.6%
HMXJ.L
3.0%

Healthcare

FPXS.L
2.9%
HMXJ.L
3.3%

Communication Services

FPXS.L
2.8%
HMXJ.L
2.6%

Utilities

FPXS.L
2.2%
HMXJ.L
3.5%

Technology

FPXS.L
0.2%
HMXJ.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXS.L
FPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HMXJ.L
HMXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FPXS.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXS.LHMXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.62

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

7.87

-1.81

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXS.L and HMXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXS.LHMXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.71

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.45

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.42

+0.06

Drawdowns

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum HMXJ.L drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXS.L and HMXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXS.LHMXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-32.30%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-7.12%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.15%

-17.47%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.15%

-17.65%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.30%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-6.74%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.37%

+0.45%

Volatility

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FPXS.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXS.LHMXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.55%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

8.30%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

10.89%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

13.80%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.04%

16.12%

-2.08%

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HMXJ.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXS.L vs. HMXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

FPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPXS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Pacific ex-Japan Equity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMXJ.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.01%3.43%3.80%4.13%3.79%2.71%3.05%3.88%3.80%3.23%3.32%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXS.L and HMXJ.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FPXS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXJ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FPXS.L and 0.40% for HMXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXS.L and HMXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer