FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO
FPR.TO (CI Preferred Share ETF) and CBCX.TO (CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - FPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by CI, while CBCX.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Technology NTR Hedged (CAD). FPR.TO is actively managed, while CBCX.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FPR.TO returned 16.79%/yr vs 46.73%/yr for CBCX.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPR.TO achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than CBCX.TO's 6.72% return.
FPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
CBCX.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPR.TO CI Preferred Share ETF | 5.83% | 16.63% | 23.27% | 3.44% | -6.27% |
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 6.72% | 21.63% | 82.92% | 108.11% | -46.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPR.TO and CBCX.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FPR.TO
CBCX.TO
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.15 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.85 | 0.68 | +5.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.28 | 1.20 | +20.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum CBCX.TO drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPR.TO and CBCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -55.21% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -54.19% | +51.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -55.21% | +47.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -35.09% | +34.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -23.92% | +18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 30.48% | -29.73% |
Volatility
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) is 1.31%, while CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that FPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBCX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 17.68% | -16.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.76% | 42.50% | -37.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.22% | 61.19% | -53.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.24% | 62.66% | -54.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 62.66% | -52.30% |
Dividends
FPR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
FPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than CBCX.TO's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPR.TO CI Preferred Share ETF | 4.03% | 4.57% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 4.59% | 3.79% | 4.42% | 4.52% | 4.49% | 4.06% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPR.TO and CBCX.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CBCX.TO is Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for FPR.TO and CBCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer