PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPNIX vs. FPACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPNIX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FPACX's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FPNIX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 2.83%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.


FPNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.14%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.83%

FPACX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.34%
6M
6.34%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
-0.02%6.71%4.58%6.78%-3.10%0.84%2.51%3.81%2.30%2.67%
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
5.34%17.69%12.42%20.30%-9.20%15.09%12.14%20.03%-7.42%10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FPNIX and FPACX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1993

0.04

Over the past year, FPNIX and FPACX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPNIX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPNIX
FPNIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FPNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FPACX
FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPNIXFPACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.59

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

9.81

-3.58

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FPACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPNIX and FPACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPNIXFPACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.20

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.75

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.49

0.77

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.88

+0.13

Drawdowns

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPNIX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum FPACX drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPNIX and FPACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPNIXFPACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-31.60%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.97%

-7.37%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.97%

-10.95%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.67%

-18.47%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.67%

-29.46%

+24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.02%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-3.88%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.94%

-1.27%

Volatility

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) is 0.75%, while FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that FPNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPNIXFPACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

2.28%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

6.65%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

8.66%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.44%

11.88%

-9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.90%

13.20%

-11.30%

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPNIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPNIX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison

FPNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than FPACX's 9.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPACX
FPA Crescent Fund
9.11%9.60%7.95%3.72%0.77%11.62%4.80%4.65%8.87%3.70%4.98%6.34%
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
3.82%3.36%4.39%3.37%2.13%1.24%2.17%2.63%3.10%2.84%2.31%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPNIX and FPACX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPACX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to FPNIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPNIX dropped -22.95% vs FPACX's -31.60%.

FPACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPNIX and FPACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer