PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPJAX vs. FJPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class A (FPJAX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FPJAX having a 29.42% return and FJPNX slightly higher at 29.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FPJAX having a 11.60% annualized return and FJPNX not far ahead at 11.90%.


FPJAX

1D
1.76%
1M
5.22%
YTD
29.42%
6M
29.75%
1Y
51.32%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
11.60%

FJPNX

1D
1.79%
1M
5.26%
YTD
29.59%
6M
29.98%
1Y
51.83%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPJAX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class A
29.42%31.28%7.02%15.59%-22.48%2.86%25.03%25.36%-15.10%29.20%
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
29.59%31.66%7.37%15.86%-22.23%3.11%25.42%25.74%-14.84%29.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FPJAX and FJPNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

1.00

The correlation between FPJAX and FJPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPJAX vs. FJPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPJAX
FPJAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FPJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FPJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FJPNX
FJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class A (FPJAX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPJAXFJPNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.86

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

14.36

-0.20

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPJAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the FJPNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPJAX and FJPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPJAX drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, smaller than the maximum FJPNX drawdown of -64.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPJAX and FJPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPJAXFJPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-64.83%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-12.74%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-19.19%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-36.23%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-36.23%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-24.86%

+14.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.42%

+0.01%

Volatility

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class A (FPJAX) and Fidelity Japan Fund (FJPNX) have volatilities of 7.95% and 7.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPJAXFJPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

7.90%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.54%

17.54%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

22.13%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

20.18%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

18.38%

-0.01%

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPJAX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FJPNX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPJAX vs. FJPNX - Dividend Comparison

FPJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, less than FJPNX's 7.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPNX
Fidelity Japan Fund
7.68%9.95%4.85%3.71%0.00%11.58%1.79%1.18%0.38%0.23%1.22%0.64%
FPJAX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class A
7.52%9.73%4.54%3.47%0.00%11.39%1.60%0.98%0.00%0.23%0.79%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FPJAX and FJPNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FPJAX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to FJPNX (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPJAX dropped -36.39% vs FJPNX's -64.83%.

FJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPJAX and FJPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer