PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPIOX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Income Opportunities Fund (FPIOX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPIOX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


FPIOX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.44%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
5.35%

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPIOX
Strategic Advisers Income Opportunities Fund
1.66%8.47%7.89%11.85%-11.84%5.35%5.64%14.77%-3.53%6.41%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-1.10%7.37%2.60%-2.11%-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FPIOX and XILSX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPIOX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPIOX
FPIOX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FPIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FPIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Income Opportunities Fund (FPIOX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPIOXXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-76.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

43.21

-41.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

117.99

-114.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

805.46

-788.59

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPIOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPIOX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPIOXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

8.17

-5.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

3.29

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

1.63

-0.68

Drawdowns

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPIOX drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPIOX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPIOXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-14.53%

-22.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-0.21%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.92%

-2.36%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.14%

-6.27%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-4.91%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.03%

+0.56%

Volatility

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Income Opportunities Fund (FPIOX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that FPIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPIOXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.43%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.11%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

3.08%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

3.77%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

3.93%

+1.61%

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPIOX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPIOX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

FPIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPIOX
Strategic Advisers Income Opportunities Fund
4.94%5.34%5.81%5.52%4.34%4.70%5.20%5.53%5.48%5.02%5.88%6.58%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPIOX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPIOX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPIOX dropped -36.95% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPIOX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer