PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPCGX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPCGX achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FPCGX has underperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 13.16%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


FPCGX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.52%
YTD
8.29%
6M
8.95%
1Y
31.86%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
13.16%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPCGX
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund
8.29%21.28%17.18%20.94%-18.85%22.96%9.07%27.43%-5.43%21.91%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCGX and VITPX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2002

0.94

The correlation between FPCGX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPCGX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPCGX
FPCGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FPCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FPCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPCGXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.38

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

15.60

-6.62

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPCGX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPCGXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.47

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.78

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.83

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPCGX drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPCGX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPCGXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.63%

-55.28%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.37%

-8.92%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.11%

-19.35%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-25.31%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-34.99%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

0.00%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-8.02%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.93%

+1.56%

Volatility

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FPCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPCGXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

2.94%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

9.19%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

12.19%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

17.35%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

18.41%

+2.78%

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPCGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPCGX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

FPCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.80%, more than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPCGX
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund
32.80%21.91%20.03%18.23%8.97%6.95%0.88%8.21%7.16%2.16%3.52%5.38%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPCGX and VITPX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPCGX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to VITPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPCGX dropped -56.63% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPCGX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer