FPCGX vs. BRK-B

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FPCGX (Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fort Pitt, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

FPCGX vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FPCGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BRK-B

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 6.45%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 1Y: 8.18%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: 13.57%
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc.	$2.04B	$2.04B	$2.42B

FPCGX vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPCGX Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund	8.29%	21.28%	17.18%	20.94%	-18.85%	22.96%	9.07%	27.43%	-5.43%	21.91%
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc.	1.77%	10.89%	27.09%	15.46%	3.31%	28.95%	2.37%	10.93%	3.01%	21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCGX and BRK-B is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between FPCGX and BRK-B has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FPCGX vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPCGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BRK-B

BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 61
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPCGX vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPCGX	BRK-B	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.57	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.88	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FPCGX	BRK-B	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.86%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.24%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.06%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FPCGX	BRK-B	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.79%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.42%	—

Dividends

FPCGX vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

FPCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.80%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPCGX Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund	32.80%	21.91%	20.03%	18.23%	8.97%	6.95%	0.88%	8.21%	7.16%	2.16%	3.52%	5.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPCGX and BRK-B in my portfolio?

FPCGX and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.