FPCGX vs. NWAUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FPCGX (Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund) and NWAUX (Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FPCGX returned 11.23%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for NWAUX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPCGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NWAUX.

Performance

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPCGX achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 7.43% return.

FPCGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 8.29%
• 6M: 8.95%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 11.23%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

NWAUX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 8.06%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 13.35%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FPCGX Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund	8.29%	21.28%	17.18%	20.94%	-18.85%	18.87%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	7.43%	-4.92%	27.90%	18.30%	-3.23%	22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCGX and NWAUX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.60

The correlation between FPCGX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FPCGX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPCGX

FPCGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
FPCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FPCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FPCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FPCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FPCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NWAUX

NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 6
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPCGX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	0.52	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	0.82	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.09	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	0.78	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	1.73	+7.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPCGX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPCGX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	0.52	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.66	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.78	-0.28

Drawdowns

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPCGX drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPCGX and NWAUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPCGX	NWAUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-21.07%	-35.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.37%	-6.70%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.11%	-19.31%	-10.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.11%	-21.07%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-8.95%	+6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-6.93%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	3.02%	+0.47%

Volatility

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 3.47%. This indicates that FPCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPCGX	NWAUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	3.47%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.01%	7.67%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	10.04%	+6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.71%	16.09%	+5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.19%	15.93%	+5.26%

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPCGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPCGX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

FPCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.80%, more than NWAUX's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPCGX Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund	32.80%	21.91%	20.03%	18.23%	8.97%	6.95%	0.88%	8.21%	7.16%	2.16%	3.52%	5.38%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	4.79%	4.35%	13.58%	0.40%	1.93%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPCGX and NWAUX in my portfolio?

FPCGX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPCGX or NWAUX?

FPCGX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to NWAUX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPCGX dropped -56.63% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.