PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPCGX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FPCGX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSKAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.94%
6M
9.36%
YTD
11.88%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPCGX
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund
8.29%21.28%17.18%20.94%-18.85%22.96%9.07%27.43%-5.43%21.91%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
11.88%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FPCGX and FSKAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.93

The correlation between FPCGX and FSKAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPCGX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPCGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund (FPCGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPCGXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPCGXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPCGXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPCGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPCGX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FPCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.80%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPCGX
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund
32.80%21.91%20.03%18.23%8.97%6.95%0.88%8.21%7.16%2.16%3.52%5.38%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPCGX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPCGX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer