FPADX vs. WARAX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) and WARAX (Allspring Absolute Return Fund) are both mutual funds - FPADX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while WARAX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, FPADX returned 10.05%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for WARAX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPADX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for WARAX.

Performance

FPADX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 23.76% return, which is significantly higher than WARAX's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FPADX has outperformed WARAX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while WARAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.68% annualized return.

FPADX

• 1D: 4.57%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 23.76%
• 6M: 26.72%
• 1Y: 45.42%
• 3Y*: 22.14%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: 10.05%

WARAX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 15.34%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 24.05%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 6.55%
• 10Y*: 5.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPADX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	23.76%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	15.34%	8.07%	5.93%	12.53%	-2.75%	2.25%	-3.25%	11.65%	-5.78%	12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FPADX and WARAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FPADX and WARAX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FPADX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

WARAX

WARAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
WARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
WARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
WARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPADX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPADX	WARAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.77	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.73	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	6.47	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.95	20.72	-7.77

FPADX vs. WARAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the WARAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and WARAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPADX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than WARAX's maximum drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and WARAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPADX	WARAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-23.16%	-16.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.28%	-3.81%	-9.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.09%	-5.67%	-10.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.86%	-13.88%	-22.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-23.16%	-16.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-3.20%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-3.83%	-9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	1.19%	+2.32%

Volatility

FPADX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) at 3.41%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPADX	WARAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.94%	3.41%	+7.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.75%	7.42%	+10.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	8.88%	+10.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	7.77%	+9.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	7.98%	+10.02%

FPADX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPADX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than WARAX's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.90%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	1.73%	2.00%	10.90%	2.80%	2.34%	3.23%	3.34%	3.38%	2.66%	1.77%	0.76%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPADX and WARAX in my portfolio?

FPADX and WARAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPADX or WARAX?

FPADX has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to WARAX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPADX dropped -39.16% vs WARAX's -23.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WARAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.