FPADX vs. TEQLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX).
FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011. TEQLX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 30, 2010.
Performance
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 3.44% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 18.28% | -14.65% | 35.16% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 0.14% | 34.10% | 6.71% | 9.23% | -20.22% | -3.07% | 17.67% | 18.59% | -14.60% | 37.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than TEQLX's 0.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FPADX having a 7.85% annualized return and TEQLX not far behind at 7.64%.
FPADX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
TEQLX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -12.40%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FPADX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank
FPADX
TEQLX
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPADX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.65 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.17 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.03 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | 7.82 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPADX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.65 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.20 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FPADX and TEQLX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison
FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than TEQLX's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.28% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.82% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 3.08% | 2.51% | 2.27% | 2.04% | 2.77% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TEQLX drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and TEQLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPADX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -39.33% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -13.32% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.04% | -37.14% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -39.33% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -13.32% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -14.74% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.45% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FPADX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) at 8.59%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPADX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 8.59% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 13.30% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 17.53% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 16.49% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.44% | +0.19% |