FPADX vs. FHKCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) and FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) are both mutual funds - FPADX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while FHKCX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FPADX returned 10.60%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for FHKCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPADX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for FHKCX.

Performance

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 39.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FPADX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.

FPADX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 31.22%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: 24.86%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

FHKCX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 39.37%
• 6M: 40.46%
• 1Y: 79.75%
• 3Y*: 34.29%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	29.97%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	39.37%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FPADX and FHKCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.86

The correlation between FPADX and FHKCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FPADX vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPADX	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	3.56	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	4.15	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.60	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	7.52	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	22.43	-6.57

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum FHKCX drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPADX	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-61.96%	+22.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.28%	-10.80%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.09%	-22.02%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.86%	-52.42%	+15.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-58.41%	+19.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.38%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.22%	-20.23%	+7.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.61%	-0.09%

Volatility

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) at 10.30%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPADX	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.85%	10.30%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.16%	18.67%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	22.87%	-2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	24.53%	-6.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	22.48%	-4.43%

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKCX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPADX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than FHKCX's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.26%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPADX and FHKCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FPADX and FHKCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FPADX or FHKCX?

FPADX has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to FHKCX (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPADX dropped -39.16% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.