PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPADX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPADX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPADX achieves a 30.04% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FPADX

1D
1.25%
1M
10.70%
YTD
30.04%
6M
32.95%
1Y
58.94%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
10.42%

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPADX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
30.04%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-7.44%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FPADX and FNILX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.66

The correlation between FPADX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPADX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPADX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPADXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.45

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

3.28

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.77

15.01

+2.76

FPADX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPADX Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPADX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPADXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

2.48

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.82

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.76

-0.39

Drawdowns

FPADX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPADX drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPADX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPADXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-33.76%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-9.01%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.09%

-19.08%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.00%

-25.40%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-5.37%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.97%

+1.37%

Volatility

FPADX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 2.88%. This indicates that FPADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPADXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

2.88%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

8.99%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

11.93%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

17.25%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

20.04%

-2.22%

FPADX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPADX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FPADX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.81%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPADX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to FNILX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPADX dropped -39.16% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPADX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer