PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPA vs. INDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPA vs. INDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 51.47% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FPA has outperformed INDA with an annualized return of 11.25%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.56% annualized return.


FPA

1D
-0.59%
1M
9.98%
YTD
51.47%
6M
51.19%
1Y
82.43%
3Y*
33.32%
5Y*
13.09%
10Y*
11.25%

INDA

1D
-1.39%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-12.38%
6M
-11.33%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPA vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
51.47%43.16%3.95%9.97%-14.55%2.98%13.43%8.91%-21.91%35.81%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-12.38%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FPA and INDA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.47

FPA vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPA
INDA

Industrials

37.1%
10.3%

Technology

16.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.6%
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
12.5%

Real Estate

6.9%
1.4%

Energy

6.7%
9.5%

Utilities

5.7%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
6.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
4.7%

Healthcare

1.0%
6.2%

Industrials

FPA
37.1%
INDA
10.3%

Technology

FPA
16.1%
INDA
8.3%

Financial Services

FPA
9.6%
INDA
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FPA
8.8%
INDA
12.5%

Real Estate

FPA
6.9%
INDA
1.4%

Energy

FPA
6.7%
INDA
9.5%

Utilities

FPA
5.7%
INDA
4.6%

Basic Materials

FPA
4.9%
INDA
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

FPA
3.2%
INDA
6.2%

Communication Services

FPA
2.6%
INDA
4.7%

Healthcare

FPA
1.0%
INDA
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPA vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPA
FPA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPA vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPAINDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

-0.84

+4.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

-1.15

+5.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.87

+0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

-0.66

+6.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.96

-1.59

+21.55

FPA vs. INDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPA Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the INDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPA and INDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPAINDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

-0.84

+4.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.15

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.31

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.23

+0.10

Drawdowns

FPA vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and INDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPAINDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.91%

-45.07%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-18.69%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.66%

-22.72%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-22.72%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.91%

-45.07%

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-19.42%

+15.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-9.57%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

7.71%

-3.57%

Volatility

FPA vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 5.26%. This indicates that FPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPAINDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.96%

5.26%

+7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.92%

12.66%

+9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.55%

14.67%

+10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

15.37%

+8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

21.12%

+1.27%

FPA vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPA vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison

FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
3.52%4.71%3.40%3.02%4.22%5.12%1.59%3.90%2.81%3.15%2.42%1.74%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPA and INDA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPA has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to INDA (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs INDA's -45.07%.

On 10-year performance, FPA leads with 11.25% vs 6.56% for INDA. On fees, INDA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPA has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPA and 0.69% for INDA.

FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPA and INDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer