PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPA vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPA vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 52.36% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


FPA

1D
-3.56%
1M
9.83%
YTD
52.36%
6M
52.58%
1Y
83.84%
3Y*
33.58%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
11.32%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPA vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
52.36%43.16%3.95%9.97%-14.55%2.98%13.43%8.91%-21.91%35.81%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FPA and FTXL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.47

The correlation between FPA and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPA vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPA
FTXL

Industrials

37.1%
0.5%

Technology

16.1%
99.5%

Financial Services

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%

-

Real Estate

6.9%

-

Energy

6.7%

-

Utilities

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Healthcare

1.0%

-

Industrials

FPA
37.1%
FTXL
0.5%

Technology

FPA
16.1%
FTXL
99.5%

Financial Services

FPA
9.6%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FPA
8.8%
FTXL

-

Real Estate

FPA
6.9%
FTXL

-

Energy

FPA
6.7%
FTXL

-

Utilities

FPA
5.7%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

FPA
4.9%
FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

FPA
3.2%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

FPA
2.6%
FTXL

-

Healthcare

FPA
1.0%
FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPA vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPA
FPA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPA vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPAFTXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.30

6.33

-3.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.99

5.74

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.78

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

15.62

-10.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.86

58.28

-37.42

FPA vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPA Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPA and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPAFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

6.33

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.97

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.94

-0.60

Drawdowns

FPA vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPAFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.91%

-43.87%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-14.51%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.66%

-41.57%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

-43.87%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

0.00%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-10.56%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.88%

+0.25%

Volatility

FPA vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) is 12.98%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPAFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.98%

14.28%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.92%

28.98%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

35.94%

-10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

36.02%

-12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.40%

34.25%

-11.85%

FPA vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPA vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
3.50%4.71%3.40%3.02%4.22%5.12%1.59%3.90%2.81%3.15%2.42%1.74%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPA and FTXL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FPA (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 13.37% for FPA. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FPA has been the lower-risk option at 12.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

FPA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPA and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 3.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPA and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer